 |
|
Deadly Cat!! - Gabriel Iglesias Video
|
CHECK OUT GABRIEL'S CHANNEL: www.youtube.com GABRIEL'S TWITTER: twitter.com GABRIEL'S FACEBOOK: www.facebook.com THANX FOR SUBSCRIBING TO MY VIDEOS!! :D MY TWITTER: twitter.com MY FACEBOOK: www.facebook.com MY GOOGLE+ Gplus.to STORE: www.raywj.com WEBSITE: raywj.com =3 Tshirt Girl twitter.com EQUALS 3 IN SPANISH: www.youtube.com **********************************************************************Here are the links to the full reviews of the content discussed in this video. Please don't harass the video creators or send them hate-messages. If you like what you see on each of their channels, feel free to subscribe to them. :) Thanx: Angry Cat: www.youtube.com Fall: www.youtube.com Russians: www.youtube.com CQOTD: www.youtube.com --- "RAY WILLIAM JOHNSON" "Ray William Johnson" RAYWILLIAMJOHNSON video videos VIDEO VIDEOS raywilliamjohnson "ray william johnson" "rwj equals three" equalsthree =3 "equals three" "equals 3" raywiliamjohnson "ray wiliam johnson" "ray williams johnson" "angry cat" "fall" "Russians"
Comments
|
|
    
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 days ago Sting (unregistered) said:
4GigQo , [url=http://dclrdbswhkqs.com/]dclrdbswhkqs[/url], [link=http://uacgccchduit.com/]uacgccchduit[/link], http://odhxlxvgvqqz.com/
4 days ago Lame User (unregistered) said:
Unz54a
4 days ago The Terminator (unregistered) said:
Elizabeth, tahkns also for your reply. You''ve given me a fair bit to think about. I think I''d like to alter my initial position a bit on DNA. Hold on, let me step back to the early 20th century. On my website I''ve written the 8 Rules of Text Art. I''d just become truly annoyed by so much gratuitous crap Stephen Bruggerman comes to mind that''s shown as text art'' that I felt the need to lay down some rules. Hubris, I know, but I was inspired the the isms'' of the first half of last century: Cubism, Fauvism, Futurism all the way up to Abstract Expressionism. These were SERIOUS artists exploring SERIOUS ideas about their art. Even the Dadaists where righteously serious when abusing their audiences. So in crafting the 8 Rules I took a serious, no-nonsense approach to the rules, namely that text art has to have substance and not merely be yet another variation of Conceptual art, which to my way of thinking is purely academic and massively boring. My other main point is that text art is a stand alone work, that once you begin introducing images it changes so that the text is generally in the service of the image. This is a small point, granted, but I''m of the opinion that artists shouldn''t worry about making art or being artists when using language, they should blow open the f**king doors of their brains and bring every element of their life and imagination into play. Language isn''t sacrosanct nor should it be a limitation. What do you want to say, fellow? Just damn well go ahead and say it no matter what form it takes and don''t be intimidated by, say, an actual sentence. Or paragraph. Or chapter. As for DNA, per above, in retrospect I suppose none of that really matters though it matters to me. My atoms, my DNA are meshed with my work and I dig that. It''s some small evidence that I existed before I pass and there''s an odd comfort in that. But there''s also power in identifying with your work beyond the parameters of the art. You can''t get lazy and lower your standards just for the sake of production. It''s what you do, it''s part of who you are.Which leads to the idea of who is a text-based artist. Good question. I have no idea unless, ah ha, they conform to the 8 Rules which again are probably just a lot of hooey. I suppose though to be considered a text-based artist, to bristle at the notion, is to somehow worry that you''re considered limited, like not a real artist because you primarily use words. Wow, there''s a whole lineage of artists who are best known for the text work including Ed Ruscha, Barbara Kruger, Glenn Ligon, Lawrence Weiner, etc. I wonder if portrait artists bristle when they''re called portrait artists. Same with landscape artists, graffiti, sculptors, musicians, actors, writers and dancers. Finally, I slagged-off the whole computer/pre-fab art industry and I was wrong, I get it. I meant it insofar as 2-D art can''t ever off the physicality and hand-craft of 3-D (and of course no DNA), but it''s still someone''s brain at work making what''s true to them, so I can''t knock anyone for that. In fact it''s probably the best thing going on this planet.
|
|
|
